Comparing and Contrasting the Book and Play Version of Shelleys Franke

Do not judge a playscript by its cover. Those atomic number 18 the words of a famous American proverb that says a persons character cannot be judged based on their appearance. This proverb is very assignment in regards to the monster from Frankenstein. On the outside, he has a terrible appearance, and as a result is victimized and made to suffer by those who cannot see chivalric his looks. Yet he has a kind soul and is simply looking for happiness and a little compassion from others. Both the book and the play manifest him as a sufferer in a cruel world but ultimately the book does a better job portraying his disorder and eliciting empathy from the reader. The monster in the book details his suffering in greater detail, is more eloquent and persuasive and also experiences a more tragic ending, and as a result the reader feels more sympathy towards him than an audience member would feel towards the monster in the play.The greater detail provided by the book to the highest degre e the monsters experiences allows the reader to sympathize with the monster more so than an audience member. When the Frankenstein monster is retelling the invoice of the hardships he has endured, he mentions events that were overlooked in the play. one and only(a) example of this is when the monster saved a girls life. Such an act would normally be considered very heroic and receive much extolment under any circumstances, but instead the monster is rewarded by being shot, receiving only the miserable pain of a wound which shattered the flesh and bone. (Shelley 135) The book also examines the months of hard work the creature put into learning about human nature and language in order to be fully genuine when he chose to reveal himself. The monster hid by the cottage for around a year, listening and learning during t... ...derstand, but he did everything within his power to fit in. He tried his best to help others, wanting nothing but acceptance in return. Yet he was cursed with a monstrous appearance. This was the one feature he had no control over, but it was the one that negated all his good intentions in the eyes of society, causing him a tremendous amount misery and lastly leading him to do some terrible things. If his monstrous appearance is just one example of any characteristic looked down upon by society, then his story is a powerful lesson for any reader. It brings to light the misery and pain inflicted possibly unknowingly by society onto those that do not fit in. Taking that into consideration, there remains a simple question who really was the monster in the novel?Work CitedShelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. Susan J. Wolfson. New York Longman, 2003.